On the fiction end, I saw a good movie over the weekend. The Weatherman, starring Nicholas Cage, covers similar ground to Elizabethtown: an angst-ridden alienated main character; a father dying; weighing the relative importance of personal relationships, career and money. But it does so in a very affecting, perceptive way that leaves you thinking about the characters long after the movie is over. The weatherman of the title works for a Chicago TV station and often has fast food thrown at him. When I lived in Chicago, I often felt like throwing a half-eaten burrito at the weatherman, who kept adding to a mountainous pile of fake snow as he gleefully predicted the next blizzard. During the movie, though, I actually felt bad for the poor slob as he cleaned the greasy mess off his suit. Cage’s character is perhaps ten years older than the character portrayed by Orlando Bloom in Elizabethtown, and is dealing with a messy divorce and two troubled teenage children. This lends his character more gravity and interest but I think the main difference between the two movies is that The Weatherman is written with empathy and intelligence, and, while sometimes funny, doesn’t compromise its integrity to play for cheap laughs.
On the other hand, I read an article in Harper’s yesterday that I wish was just a movie. In fact it was a movie, The Constant Gardener. The Constant Gardener is based on a novel by John Le Carre, and it certainly is a believable story. What I didn’t realize is that it is essentially a true story.. minus Rachel Weisz’s murder. Apparently the National Institutes of Health, in conjunction with a German based pharmaceutical company conducted studies of a drug, nevrapirine, that supposedly reduces the chances of HIV transmission from mother to child. These studies, conducted mainly on economically disadvantaged pregnant women, were conducted mainly in Africa but also in the US. They were conducted remarkably sloppily–without blind testing or placebo controls. The results of the studies were ambiguous and unreliable, and nevrapirine proved extremely toxic to both mothers and children. Quite a few participants died (this was reported as a :”serious adverse event”).
But surprise, surprise. All these negative results were covered up, whistleblowers were silenced, and the nevrapirine was approved for use Another shocking bit of information revealed in this article is that there is no conclusive link between HIV and AIDS. There are other, equally credible, theories for AIDS transmission that have been passed over in the rush to develop profitable drugs based on the HIV hypothesis.
If you want to check it out, read this month’s edition of Harper’s.